<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brewers&#8217; Postmortem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/09/12/brewers-postmortem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/09/12/brewers-postmortem/</link>
	<description>The Wisconsin Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:32:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/09/12/brewers-postmortem/comment-page-1/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketdoppler.com/?p=1274#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>While Cain has had a terrific year, the emergence of Sanchez together with Fielder&#039;s outstanding season suggests to me that they might be more comfortable with dealing Cain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Cain has had a terrific year, the emergence of Sanchez together with Fielder&#8217;s outstanding season suggests to me that they might be more comfortable with dealing Cain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigSnakeMan</title>
		<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/09/12/brewers-postmortem/comment-page-1/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>BigSnakeMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketdoppler.com/?p=1274#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>Fielder for Cain would still be all right by me.  But if the Giants weren&#039;t inclined to do such a deal last year, I should think they&#039;d be less so now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fielder for Cain would still be all right by me.  But if the Giants weren&#8217;t inclined to do such a deal last year, I should think they&#8217;d be less so now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/09/12/brewers-postmortem/comment-page-1/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketdoppler.com/?p=1274#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>A year ago you suggested a Fielder for Matt Cain deal; I think it has a better chance of happening this off-season than last. Of course, should MKE do that, surrendering first base to Mat Gamel (he of the gaping hole in his swing), they significantly reduce their offense.

Hart and Hardy, together with a prospect or two, might get them another middle of the rotation guy, but not much more.

No, the future does not look bright for The Crew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago you suggested a Fielder for Matt Cain deal; I think it has a better chance of happening this off-season than last. Of course, should MKE do that, surrendering first base to Mat Gamel (he of the gaping hole in his swing), they significantly reduce their offense.</p>
<p>Hart and Hardy, together with a prospect or two, might get them another middle of the rotation guy, but not much more.</p>
<p>No, the future does not look bright for The Crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
