<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Agency Con</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/02/28/free-agency-con/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/02/28/free-agency-con/</link>
	<description>The Wisconsin Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:27:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/02/28/free-agency-con/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketdoppler.com/?p=583#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>If you believe TT and M-3, it&#039;s not all that different that they can&#039;t make do with what they have.  But I read this morning that they will likely lose Colin Cole.  While Cole wasn&#039;t a great player, losing him will certainly be a blow to their depth on the D-line.  So, it would seem logical that they would at least do some shopping in the second tier.  Unfortunately, that is not going to satisfy TT&#039;s many detractors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe TT and M-3, it&#8217;s not all that different that they can&#8217;t make do with what they have.  But I read this morning that they will likely lose Colin Cole.  While Cole wasn&#8217;t a great player, losing him will certainly be a blow to their depth on the D-line.  So, it would seem logical that they would at least do some shopping in the second tier.  Unfortunately, that is not going to satisfy TT&#8217;s many detractors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://pocketdoppler.com/2009/02/28/free-agency-con/comment-page-1/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pocketdoppler.com/?p=583#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>I agree to some extent, although when the team makes a dramatic change in defensive philosophy it would seem like an ideal time to be a more active participant in free agency. Do the Packers really feel that their front seven, as is, will adapt quickly and effectively to a 3-4 when few if any of these guys have played in a 3-4 system? I understand that the philosophy has been to build through the draft, but they have been building a 4-3 defense through the draft and not a 3-4. Perhaps the Pack will look to some second-tier free agent types to build some depth with folks more familiar with the new system. If they sit tight they are sure putting a lot of faith, and pressure, in the new coaching staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree to some extent, although when the team makes a dramatic change in defensive philosophy it would seem like an ideal time to be a more active participant in free agency. Do the Packers really feel that their front seven, as is, will adapt quickly and effectively to a 3-4 when few if any of these guys have played in a 3-4 system? I understand that the philosophy has been to build through the draft, but they have been building a 4-3 defense through the draft and not a 3-4. Perhaps the Pack will look to some second-tier free agent types to build some depth with folks more familiar with the new system. If they sit tight they are sure putting a lot of faith, and pressure, in the new coaching staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: pocketdoppler.com @ 2012-02-08 15:11:15 -->
